All formats
GIF vs WebP
WebP does everything GIF does, at a fraction of the size, without GIF's 256-colour limit. GIF's only remaining advantage is that it plays in absolutely everything, including email clients. For anything on a modern website, WebP or a short video file is the better answer.
Side by side
| Spec | GIF | WebP |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Image | Image |
| Extensions | .gif | .webp |
| Introduced | 1987 | 2010 |
| Compression | Lossless | Both |
| MIME type | image/gif | image/webp |
| Use it when | A short looping animation must autoplay in a context that will not allow video. | Serving images on the web and you want the smallest files with broad browser support. |
| Avoid it when | Anywhere video is allowed, or for still photographs. Use MP4/WebM or PNG/WebP. | Handing files to a client, a printer, or older desktop software that may not support it. |
Where the usual answer breaks
Email. Most email clients still do not render animated WebP, so animated GIF remains the working choice there.
GIF
- Animation support that plays essentially everywhere
- Simple single-color transparency
- Universally recognised
- Maximum 256 colours per frame, causing visible banding
- Animated GIFs are far larger than an equivalent short video
- No partial transparency
WebP
- Smaller than JPG at similar visual quality, and smaller than PNG when lossless
- Supports transparency and animation, which JPG cannot
- Supported in all current major browsers
- Older desktop software and some print workflows still will not open it
- Lossy WebP, like JPG, degrades on every re-encode
Convert between GIF and WebP
Tools for these formats
Other comparisons
Last updated 2026-08-03